Trump And Vance Aren’t Defying The Constitution, They’re Following It
Democrats and pundits have exaggerated Vice President J.D. Vance’s remarks into a ‘constitutional crisis.’
Under the Constitution, “the President is invested with certain important political powers, in the exercise of which he is to use his own discretion.” For his decisions, “he is accountable only to his country in his political character, and to his own conscience.” His choices cannot be questioned in court because “the subjects are political. They respect the nation, not individual rights, and being entrusted to the executive, the decision of the executive is conclusive.”
Who penned these outrageous words? Democrats and many pundits might answer Vice President J.D. Vance. Over the weekend, Vance provoked an onslaught of criticism for suggesting that federal district judges “aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power.”
But the usual suspects would be wrong. The right answer is John Marshall, the greatest chief justice in Supreme Court history. And he did not squirrel this view away in a private journal. Instead, Marshall publicly explained that courts could not review presidential decisions on “political” subjects “entrusted to the executive” in a Supreme Court opinion.
Constitutionalism
.jpg)
Charles Kesler’s Struggle for the Founders’ Constitution
Charles Kesler’s defense of the American Founding from its critics on the left and right alike can help us recover our most cherished principles.
Trump Has Launched a Necessary Fight Over the President’s Spending Discretion
Whether he realizes it or not, he could help restore the system the Founders envisioned.
Four Questions and Few Answers About the Invasion Clause
Whatever the meaning of the invasion clause, the answer cannot turn on the unprecedented nature of the Trump presidency.
To Fire or Not To Fire?
With the ever-greater aggrandizement of power in the hand of the chief executive, the stronger case is to keep independent agencies as a neutral check on presidential power.
